Sentiment, Readability, and Disclosure Quality in Corporate Financial Reporting: A Textual and Behavioral Perspective on Market Information Efficiency

Authors

  • Dr. Lucas Moreau Université de Lyon, France

Keywords:

Financial disclosure quality, textual analysis, sentiment mining, readability

Abstract

Corporate financial reporting has evolved from a predominantly numerical disclosure system into a complex narrative-driven communication mechanism where textual content plays a decisive role in shaping investor perception, market reactions, and information efficiency. This study develops an extensive theoretical and empirical synthesis of how sentiment, readability, and disclosure quality embedded within corporate financial reports influence capital market outcomes. Drawing strictly from established literature on textual analysis, sentiment mining, disclosure adequacy, regulatory filings, and behavioral finance, the article examines the informational role of narrative disclosures such as annual reports, SEC filings, earnings communications, and voluntary textual supplements. By integrating classical disclosure theory with modern text analytics and deep learning-based sentiment extraction, this research bridges early foundational disclosure studies with contemporary computational approaches. The article elaborates on how linguistic tone, complexity, and structure affect stock return synchronicity, analyst behavior, investor attention, and fraud detection. It also critically evaluates the implications of digital reporting formats such as XBRL and multimodal disclosures that combine textual and vocal sentiment. Through an in-depth descriptive methodology, the findings reveal that textual characteristics are not merely stylistic artifacts but function as economically meaningful signals that shape capital allocation decisions, corporate transparency, and governance outcomes. The discussion highlights theoretical tensions between information overload and informativeness, managerial discretion versus market discipline, and technological sophistication versus interpretive bias. Limitations related to context dependency, linguistic ambiguity, and regulatory heterogeneity are explored in detail, alongside future research directions focusing on cross-country disclosure regimes and ethical considerations in automated text interpretation. This study contributes to accounting, finance, and information systems literature by offering a unified, deeply elaborated framework for understanding narrative financial disclosure as a central pillar of modern market information architecture.

References

Azimi, Mehran, and Anup Agrawal. 2018. “Is the Sentiment in Corporate Annual Reports Informative? Evidence from Deep Learning.” https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3258821.

Bai, Xuelian, Yi Dong, and Nan Hu. 2019. “Financial Report Readability and Stock Return Synchronicity.” Applied Economics 51 (4): 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1495824.

Ball, Christopher, Gerard Hoberg, and Vojislav Maksimovic. 2012. “Redefining Financial Constraints: A Text-Based Analysis.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1923467.

Bao, Yang, Bin Ke, Bin Li, Y. Julia Yu, and Jie Zhang. 2015. “Detecting Accounting Frauds in Publicly Traded U.S. Firms: New Perspective and New Method.” SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2670703.

Bartley, Jon, Al Y. S. Chen, and Eileen Z. Taylor. 2011. “A Comparison of XBRL Filings to Corporate 10-Ks: Evidence from the Voluntary Filing Program.” Accounting Horizons 25 (2): 227–245. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10028.

Beams, Joseph, and Yun Chia Yan. 2015. “The Effect of Financial Crisis on Auditor Conservatism: US Evidence.” Accounting Research Journal 28 (2): 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-06-2013-0033.

Ben-Rephael, Azi, Zhi Da, Peter D. Easton, and Ryan D. Israelsen. 2017. “Who Pays Attention to SEC Form 8-K?” SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942503.

Chen. 2013. “Opinion Mining for Relating Multiword Subjective Expressions and Annual Earnings in US Financial Statements.” Journal of Information Science and Engineering.

Chen, Chien Liang, Chao Lin Liu, Yuan Chen Chang, and Hsiang Ping Tsai. 2011. “Mining Opinion Holders and Opinion Patterns in US Financial Statements.” Proceedings of the Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2011.19.

Chen, Yu, Rhaad M. Rabbani, Aparna Gupta, and Mohammed J. Zaki. 2018. “Comparative Text Analytics via Topic Modeling in Banking.” IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence Proceedings, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2017.8280945.

Christensen, Theodore E., William G. Heninger, and Earl K. Stice. 2013. “Factors Associated with Price Reactions and Analysts’ Forecast Revisions around SEC Filings.” Research in Accounting Regulation 25 (2): 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2013.08.003.

Tailor, P., and A. Kale. 2025. “Multimodal Sentiment Analysis of Earnings Calls and SEC Filings: A Deep Learning Approach to Financial Disclosures.” Utilitas Mathematica 122: 3163–3168.

Singhvi, S. S. 1968. “Characteristics and Implications of Inadequate Disclosure: A Case Study of India.” The International Journal of Accounting Education and Research 3: 29–43.

Singhvi, S. S., and H. B. Desai. 1971. “An Empirical Analysis of the Quality of Corporate Financial Disclosure.” The Accounting Review 46 (1): 129–138.

Thakor, A. V. 1990. “Investment ‘Myopia’ and the Internal Organization of Capital Allocation Decisions.” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 6 (1): 129–145.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Dr. Lucas Moreau. (2025). Sentiment, Readability, and Disclosure Quality in Corporate Financial Reporting: A Textual and Behavioral Perspective on Market Information Efficiency. Academic Reseach Library for International Journal of Computer Science & Information System, 10(11), 119–123. Retrieved from https://colomboscipub.com/index.php/arlijcsis/article/view/71